Triple
T15834850
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ITU-T G.hn |
E383958
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsBridging |
P119835
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [ITU-T G.hn, supportsBridging, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsBridging Context triple: [ITU-T G.hn, supportsBridging, yes]
-
A.
hasBridgeTo
Indicates that one entity is connected to another by a bridge or bridging structure that allows passage or linkage between them.
-
B.
hasBridgeAccess
Indicates that an entity is permitted to enter or use a specific bridge or bridge-controlled area.
-
C.
supportedIn
Indicates that one entity is valid, applicable, or functionally enabled within the context, environment, platform, or scope defined by another entity.
-
D.
supportedAs
Indicates that one entity is accepted, recognized, or treated as being in the role, type, or representation of another entity.
-
E.
supportsPort
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, providing, or being compatible with a specified port or port configuration.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da34c888190976e06c4019d415a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e11e673e08819080c3f55a225607c7 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e005418f588190824d91ff7974dada |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e007647f908190adb178c68c7bb7cf |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.