Triple

T1582920
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Insurance Commissioner of California E34005 entity
Predicate canBring P32880 FINISHED
Object administrative enforcement actions against insurers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: administrative enforcement actions against insurers | Statement: [Insurance Commissioner of California, canBring, administrative enforcement actions against insurers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBring
Context triple: [Insurance Commissioner of California, canBring, administrative enforcement actions against insurers]
  • A. canHold
    Indicates that one entity has the capacity or ability to contain, support, or carry another entity.
  • B. canBe
    Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
  • C. canPass
    Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
  • D. canUse
    Indicates that one entity has the ability, permission, or suitability to make use of another entity or resource.
  • E. canMake
    Indicates that one entity has the ability or capacity to create, produce, or assemble another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885fceb2c8190b47e0f7c0aefbff0 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abacfb1144819080c5687175aba1e1 completed March 7, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69aa61b0f5bc8190b1dc272990a59c13 completed March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abacf991148190b20521c063f93bfd completed March 7, 2026, 4:43 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.