Triple
T15824429
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chamber of Deputies electoral system of Chile |
E383699
|
entity |
| Predicate | reformApprovedIn |
P119782
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2015 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2015 | Statement: [Chamber of Deputies electoral system of Chile, reformApprovedIn, 2015]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reformApprovedIn Context triple: [Chamber of Deputies electoral system of Chile, reformApprovedIn, 2015]
-
A.
2006ReformApproved
Indicates that a reform measure proposed in 2006 has received formal approval or authorization.
-
B.
reformedWithSupportFrom
Indicates that an entity underwent reform or significant change with the assistance, backing, or encouragement of another entity.
-
C.
reformsBy
Indicates that one entity initiates, implements, or is responsible for changes or improvements (reforms) affecting another entity.
-
D.
approvedByReferendum
Indicates that a decision, measure, or proposal has been formally accepted through a public referendum vote.
-
E.
approvedAt
Indicates the date and time at which an entity received formal approval.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da34c888190976e06c4019d415a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e11e5f46748190acb46cc482501307 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e005418f588190824d91ff7974dada |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e007647f908190adb178c68c7bb7cf |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.