Triple
T15817451
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Varyag |
E383514
|
entity |
| Predicate | crewReputation |
P28205
|
FINISHED |
| Object | noted for bravery at Chemulpo Bay |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: noted for bravery at Chemulpo Bay | Statement: [Varyag, crewReputation, noted for bravery at Chemulpo Bay]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: crewReputation Context triple: [Varyag, crewReputation, noted for bravery at Chemulpo Bay]
-
A.
clubReputation
Indicates the perceived status, prestige, or standing of a club within its relevant community or domain.
-
B.
tacticalReputation
Indicates the perceived level of skill, reliability, or effectiveness an entity has in planning and executing tactics within a given context.
-
C.
hasQuirkyReputation
Indicates that an entity is regarded by others as having an unusual, eccentric, or unconventional character or style.
-
D.
seaReputation
chosen
Indicates the perceived status, trustworthiness, or renown of an entity specifically within maritime or sea-related contexts.
-
E.
choirReputation
Indicates the perceived quality or standing of a choir based on others’ opinions or evaluations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0c4a4332c8190bc525e06d6f3a6b4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e0053b847c8190945726c3ddac21cc |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.