Triple

T15815514
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Haozhou E383465 entity
Predicate locatedNear P294 FINISHED
Object Fengyang E1178371 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fengyang | Statement: [Haozhou, locatedNear, Fengyang]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fengyang
Context triple: [Haozhou, locatedNear, Fengyang]
  • A. Fengyang County chosen
    Fengyang County is a county in Anhui Province, China, historically notable as the birthplace of the Ming dynasty’s founding emperor, Zhu Yuanzhang.
  • B. Yifang
    Yifang is a given name of Chinese origin used for both males and females.
  • C. Huai-an
    Huai-an is an older romanized spelling of Huaian, a prefecture-level city in Jiangsu Province, China, known for its historical significance and canal-based waterways.
  • D. Guanghe
    Guanghe was an era name used during the reign of Emperor Ling of the Eastern Han dynasty in ancient China.
  • E. Gaoyang
    Gaoyang is a legendary figure in ancient Chinese mythology, often associated with early royal lineages and revered as an ancestral progenitor by various clans.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0c4a219508190b8588120ec415ac7 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ffa131784c8190bd6aba2cca084d20 completed May 9, 2026, 9:03 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:49 a.m.