Triple
T15808224
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Iowa Court of Appeals |
E383275
|
entity |
| Predicate | judicialSelectionProcess |
P44083
|
FINISHED |
| Object | merit-based selection |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: merit-based selection | Statement: [Iowa Court of Appeals, judicialSelectionProcess, merit-based selection]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialSelectionProcess Context triple: [Iowa Court of Appeals, judicialSelectionProcess, merit-based selection]
-
A.
judiciaryChosenBy
Indicates that the members of the judiciary are selected or appointed by a specified person, group, or institution.
-
B.
jurySelectionMethod
Indicates the process or criteria used to choose individuals who will serve on a jury.
-
C.
chiefJusticeAppointmentProcess
Indicates the procedure or set of rules by which a chief justice is selected, nominated, and formally appointed to office.
-
D.
nominatingProcess
chosen
Indicates the procedure or set of actions through which candidates are formally proposed or selected for a position, role, or recognition.
-
E.
justicesSelectedFrom
Indicates that certain justices are chosen or appointed from a particular group, body, or pool of candidates.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b52896bc819086ef95cc63e90daa |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e0053b847c8190945726c3ddac21cc |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.