Triple
T15808079
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ansel Briggs |
E383272
|
entity |
| Predicate | residence |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Andrew, Iowa |
E1146787
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Andrew, Iowa | Statement: [Ansel Briggs, residence, Andrew, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Andrew, Iowa Context triple: [Ansel Briggs, residence, Andrew, Iowa]
-
A.
Andrew, Iowa
chosen
Andrew, Iowa is a small rural city that serves as the county seat of Jackson County in eastern Iowa.
-
B.
Ainsworth, Iowa
Ainsworth, Iowa is a small rural city in southeastern Iowa known for its close-knit community and agricultural surroundings.
-
C.
Anita, Iowa
Anita, Iowa is a small rural city in southwestern Iowa known for its close-knit community and proximity to Lake Anita State Park.
-
D.
Alpha, Iowa
Alpha, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in northeastern Iowa within Fayette County.
-
E.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b52896bc819086ef95cc63e90daa |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff998fa5588190b28efc2f342405aa |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.