Triple

T15803460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chao E383151 entity
Predicate romanizationFrom P120139 FINISHED
Object Mandarin Chinese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mandarin Chinese | Statement: [Chao, romanizationFrom, Mandarin Chinese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanizationFrom
Context triple: [Chao, romanizationFrom, Mandarin Chinese]
  • A. romanizationProcess
    Indicates the process of converting text from a non-Latin writing system into a representation using the Latin alphabet.
  • B. romanizationOfToponymType
    Indicates a relationship where a specific type of place-name is expressed in a romanized (Latin-script) form corresponding to its original writing system.
  • C. hasRomanizationOf
    Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation (written in the Latin alphabet) of the other entity’s original script form.
  • D. romanizationBegan
    Indicates that the process of converting text from one writing system into its representation using the Roman (Latin) alphabet was initiated.
  • E. romanizationOccurred
    Indicates that a process of converting text from one writing system into the Roman (Latin) alphabet has taken place.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0b524835c8190ae286b2562f07756 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e0053b847c8190945726c3ddac21cc completed April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e00e48d49c819081afccb02f9cf18b completed April 15, 2026, 10:16 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.