Triple

T15803379
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lai E383149 entity
Predicate hasTransliterationSource P79218 FINISHED
Object Mandarin Chinese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mandarin Chinese | Statement: [Lai, hasTransliterationSource, Mandarin Chinese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTransliterationSource
Context triple: [Lai, hasTransliterationSource, Mandarin Chinese]
  • A. hasTransliterationRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity participates in a transliteration process with a specific role (e.g., source, target, or agent of transliteration).
  • B. hasTransliterationType
    Indicates the type or system of transliteration used to convert text from one writing system into another.
  • C. hasTransliterationRule
    Indicates that there exists a specific rule or mapping that defines how text in one script or writing system is systematically converted into another.
  • D. transliterationTarget
    Indicates that one entity is the target script or form into which another entity is transliterated.
  • E. hasTranslation
    Indicates that one entity is a translation or translated version of another entity in a different language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da2858c819090cc8481e7207b6e completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0b524835c8190ae286b2562f07756 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e0053b847c8190945726c3ddac21cc completed April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.