Triple
T15800364
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scottish court in the Netherlands at Camp Zeist |
E383080
|
entity |
| Predicate | verdictForLaminKhalifahFhimah |
P9727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not guilty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not guilty | Statement: [Scottish court in the Netherlands at Camp Zeist, verdictForLaminKhalifahFhimah, not guilty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: verdictForLaminKhalifahFhimah Context triple: [Scottish court in the Netherlands at Camp Zeist, verdictForLaminKhalifahFhimah, not guilty]
-
A.
verdict
chosen
Indicates the formal decision or judgment reached and declared at the conclusion of a legal or evaluative process.
-
B.
finalImam
Indicates that an entity is the last or ultimate Imam in a recognized sequence of Imams.
-
C.
hasRulingInFiqh
Indicates that a subject has an associated legal ruling or judgment within the framework of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh).
-
D.
statusOfAbdullahAlSenussiCase
Indicates the current legal or procedural state of the case involving Abdullah Al-Senussi.
-
E.
leadingJudgmentBy
Indicates a relationship where one judgment or legal decision is treated as the primary or authoritative basis guiding or influencing another judgment.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da16e188190b89af699f1ed0bfe |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b4e135b08190b736e77bac5e2bff |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e0053b847c8190945726c3ddac21cc |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.