Triple
T1580026
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Four Freedoms |
E33740
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | human rights concept |
C8974
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: human rights concept Context triple: [Four Freedoms, instanceOf, human rights concept]
-
A.
international human rights instrument
An international human rights instrument is a formal, legally or politically binding document adopted by states or international organizations that defines, codifies, and promotes the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms across national borders.
-
B.
human rights advocate
A human rights advocate is an individual who actively works to protect, promote, and advance the fundamental rights and freedoms of all people through education, policy influence, legal action, and public engagement.
-
C.
United Nations human rights review mechanism
A United Nations human rights review mechanism is a formal, periodic process through which UN bodies assess and monitor states’ compliance with international human rights obligations, typically involving state reports, independent expert or peer review, and public recommendations for improvement.
-
D.
human rights monitoring mechanism
A human rights monitoring mechanism is a structured system of institutions, procedures, and tools designed to systematically observe, assess, and report on states’ compliance with international and domestic human rights obligations.
-
E.
humanist
A humanist is a person who emphasizes the value, dignity, and agency of human beings, focusing on reason, ethics, and human welfare rather than divine or supernatural matters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885f27a4c8190a4622252cdf54c00 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.