Triple
T15791288
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pareto |
E382866
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDerivedConcept |
P909
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pareto efficiency |
E145374
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pareto efficiency | Statement: [Pareto, hasDerivedConcept, Pareto efficiency]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pareto efficiency Context triple: [Pareto, hasDerivedConcept, Pareto efficiency]
-
A.
Pareto efficiency
chosen
Pareto efficiency is an economic concept describing an allocation of resources where no individual can be made better off without making someone else worse off.
-
B.
Pareto improvement
A Pareto improvement is a change in allocation that makes at least one individual better off without making anyone else worse off.
-
C.
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.
-
D.
second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
The second fundamental theorem of welfare economics states that, under certain ideal conditions, any Pareto efficient allocation of resources can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium given an appropriate redistribution of initial endowments.
-
E.
Nash equilibrium
A Nash equilibrium is a game-theoretic solution concept where no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy, given the strategies of all other players.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da16e188190b89af699f1ed0bfe |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e142df48e8819083a48d3b7b3f7f5d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff998981088190b9ce9d99c0481e21 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.