Triple
T15790222
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IPER |
E382844
|
entity |
| Predicate | subjectMatter |
P450
|
FINISHED |
| Object | patentability under PCT criteria |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: patentability under PCT criteria | Statement: [IPER, subjectMatter, patentability under PCT criteria]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da16e188190b89af699f1ed0bfe |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b4d6b5788190883746ee82c799f5 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.