Triple
T15787526
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reform Party of Canada |
E382775
|
entity |
| Predicate | officialOppositionTo |
P13678
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2000 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2000 | Statement: [Reform Party of Canada, officialOppositionTo, 2000]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: officialOppositionTo Context triple: [Reform Party of Canada, officialOppositionTo, 2000]
-
A.
parliamentaryOppositionTo
chosen
Indicates that one party, group, or member within a parliamentary system formally opposes the policies, actions, or proposals of another.
-
B.
opposition
Indicates a relationship in which one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or is positioned against another entity, idea, or action.
-
C.
primaryOpposition
Indicates the main or most significant opposing relationship between two entities, such as their chief rival, counterforce, or contrasting position.
-
D.
opposedPoliticalEntity
Indicates that one political entity is in opposition or conflict with another in terms of policies, ideology, or power.
-
E.
oppositionAlliance
Indicates a relationship where entities form or belong to an alliance that is collectively opposed to another entity or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86da16e188190b89af699f1ed0bfe |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0540380448190a025338f0e62e6d1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 3:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e00537bd1c81908d6e832792fd934f |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:48 a.m.