Triple

T15769063
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gove bauxite mine E382300 entity
Predicate hasMiningLease P120263 FINISHED
Object Gove Peninsula mining leases LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gove Peninsula mining leases | Statement: [Gove bauxite mine, hasMiningLease, Gove Peninsula mining leases]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMiningLease
Context triple: [Gove bauxite mine, hasMiningLease, Gove Peninsula mining leases]
  • A. hasMiningArea
    Indicates that an entity possesses, controls, or is associated with a designated area where mining activities take place.
  • B. hasMiningLicenseJurisdiction
    Indicates that an authority or region has legal jurisdiction over the issuance, regulation, or enforcement of a mining license.
  • C. hasMiningActivity
    Indicates that some form of mining operation or extraction activity is occurring at, involving, or associated with the referenced entity.
  • D. hasMiningProject
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, operates, or is responsible for a mining project.
  • E. hasMiningCommodity
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, produces, or contains a specific mining-related commodity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86da09a10819082fe9797b23e4664 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e051951bac8190a7d45f3612c6de72 completed April 16, 2026, 3:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e00531e7ac8190a4190cce4f7fab4c completed April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e03cc871d0819085c0fc54de7984ff completed April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:47 a.m.