Triple
T15759919
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Horton Kirby |
E382068
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHistoricParishCharacter |
P120219
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Horton Kirby, hasHistoricParishCharacter, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricParishCharacter Context triple: [Horton Kirby, hasHistoricParishCharacter, true]
-
A.
hasParishHistory
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a documented historical record of a parish.
-
B.
isHistoricParishOf
Indicates that one entity is a historic parish that formerly served, or is recognized as having served, as the parish jurisdiction for another entity.
-
C.
hasHistoricChurches
Indicates that an entity possesses or contains one or more churches of recognized historical significance.
-
D.
hasTraditionalParish
Indicates that an entity is associated with or belongs to a specific traditional parish.
-
E.
isHistoricRuralCommunity
Indicates that a community is located in a rural area and holds recognized historical significance or heritage value.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9e6b44819085d1f6a969ecb74c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e050b35ea48190a758ee76a57b5451 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 3 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e00531e7ac8190a4190cce4f7fab4c |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e03cc871d0819085c0fc54de7984ff |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:35 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:47 a.m.