Triple
T15751670
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tromsø amt |
E381860
|
entity |
| Predicate | borders |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nordlands amt |
E401032
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nordlands amt | Statement: [Tromsø amt, borders, Nordlands amt]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nordlands amt Context triple: [Tromsø amt, borders, Nordlands amt]
-
A.
Tromsø amt
Tromsø amt was a former administrative county in northern Norway that historically encompassed the area later known as Troms.
-
B.
Nordland county
chosen
Nordland county is a long, coastal region in northern Norway known for its dramatic fjords, islands, and Arctic landscapes.
-
C.
Helgeland district
Helgeland district is a traditional region in southern Nordland county, Norway, known for its coastal archipelagos, fjords, and scattered rural communities.
-
D.
Romsdals amt
Romsdals amt was a former county-level administrative division in Norway, historically located in the Romsdal region along the country’s western coast.
-
E.
Stavanger amt
Stavanger amt was a former administrative county in southwestern Norway that encompassed areas including Finnøy before later being reorganized into modern Rogaland county.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9e6b44819085d1f6a969ecb74c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e05030e31081908c307a8dc7067db4 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:57 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a00dbf2567c81909ab6054ade27afac |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:47 a.m.