Triple
T15741671
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arabic Lām |
E381615
|
entity |
| Predicate | commonLigature |
P9191
|
FINISHED |
| Object | لا |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: لا | Statement: [Arabic Lām, commonLigature, لا]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonLigature Context triple: [Arabic Lām, commonLigature, لا]
-
A.
hasLigatures
chosen
Indicates that one writing system, font, or text includes combined character forms (ligatures) that join two or more individual glyphs into a single symbol.
-
B.
symbolCombines
Indicates that multiple symbols are merged or joined together to form a single composite symbol or representation.
-
C.
usesColloquialCharacters
Indicates that an expression, name, or text is written using informal, non-standard, or colloquial characters rather than formal or standard script.
-
D.
hasCursiveJoining
Indicates that one written character is connected to another through cursive-style joining.
-
E.
hasContextualLetterForms
Indicates that the written form of a letter changes shape depending on its surrounding characters or position within a word.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9cdb648190bf3171be0bd7d872 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e0b4d6b5788190883746ee82c799f5 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 10:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e0052c6208819098165d61d378d13b |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:46 a.m.