Triple
T15726188
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japheth |
E381222
|
entity |
| Predicate | blessingDescribedAs |
P45623
|
FINISHED |
| Object | God shall enlarge Japheth |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: God shall enlarge Japheth | Statement: [Japheth, blessingDescribedAs, God shall enlarge Japheth]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: blessingDescribedAs Context triple: [Japheth, blessingDescribedAs, God shall enlarge Japheth]
-
A.
blessedBy
Indicates that one entity has conferred a blessing, favor, or sacred endorsement upon another entity.
-
B.
promiseOfBlessingTo
Indicates that one entity has declared or assured a future blessing or favorable outcome to another entity.
-
C.
associatedWithBlessing
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is connected to, linked with, or characterized by a blessing or act of blessing.
-
D.
blessingRecordedIn
Indicates that a blessing event or act has been documented or preserved within a specific record, text, or medium.
-
E.
describedAsInJacobBlessing
chosen
Indicates that an entity is characterized or portrayed in the specific manner it appears within Jacob’s blessing narrative (e.g., in Genesis 49).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d9cdb648190bf3171be0bd7d872 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04fb357a88190a92641c8a8c20573 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e00526759c819088b80d85138b8974 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:46 a.m.