Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Abington School District v. Schempp | Statement: [Engel v. Vitale, relatedCase, Abington School District v. Schempp]

Target entity: Abington School District v. Schempp
Context triple: [Engel v. Vitale, relatedCase, Abington School District v. Schempp]

• A. Lemon v. Kurtzman
  Lemon v. Kurtzman is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "Lemon test" for determining whether government actions violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• B. Engel v. Vitale
  Engel v. Vitale is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled state-sponsored prayer in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• C. Everson v. Board of Education
  Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.
• D. Lee v. Weisman
  Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
• E. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
  Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that established students do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights at school, so long as their expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Abington School District v. Schempp
Triple: [Engel v. Vitale, relatedCase, Abington School District v. Schempp]

Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

Target entity: Abington School District v. Schempp
Target entity description: Abington School District v. Schempp is a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case that held mandatory Bible readings in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

• A. Lemon v. Kurtzman
  Lemon v. Kurtzman is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "Lemon test" for determining whether government actions violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• B. Engel v. Vitale
  Engel v. Vitale is a 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled state-sponsored prayer in public schools unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• C. Everson v. Board of Education
  Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.
• D. Lee v. Weisman
  Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
• E. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
  Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court case that established students do not lose their First Amendment free speech rights at school, so long as their expression does not substantially disrupt the educational environment.
• F. None of above. chosen