Triple

T15723103
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject El Diente Peak E381150 entity
Predicate hasNearbyTown P3883 FINISHED
Object Dolores, Colorado NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dolores, Colorado | Statement: [El Diente Peak, hasNearbyTown, Dolores, Colorado]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dolores, Colorado
Context triple: [El Diente Peak, hasNearbyTown, Dolores, Colorado]
  • A. Dolores, Colorado chosen
    Dolores, Colorado is a small historic town in Montezuma County known as a gateway to the San Juan Mountains and nearby archaeological and outdoor recreation sites.
  • B. Rosita, Colorado
    Rosita, Colorado is a historic former silver-mining town in Custer County that is now largely a ghost town and unincorporated community.
  • C. Cortez, Colorado
    Cortez, Colorado is a small city in southwestern Colorado known as a gateway to Mesa Verde National Park and the Four Corners region.
  • D. La Veta, Colorado
    La Veta, Colorado is a small historic town in southern Colorado known as a gateway to the Spanish Peaks and the scenic Highway of Legends.
  • E. Montezuma, Colorado
    Montezuma, Colorado is a small historic mountain town in the Colorado Rockies known for its mining heritage and scenic alpine surroundings.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d86d9cdb648190bf3171be0bd7d872 completed April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e04fb1fdd4819088f3e243263e5f73 completed April 16, 2026, 2:55 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:46 a.m.