Triple
T15694984
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jackson, Mississippi |
E380436
|
entity |
| Predicate | partlyIn |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rankin County |
E63877
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rankin County | Statement: [Jackson, Mississippi, partlyIn, Rankin County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rankin County Context triple: [Jackson, Mississippi, partlyIn, Rankin County]
-
A.
Rankin County
chosen
Rankin County is a county in central Mississippi that forms part of the Jackson metropolitan area and includes some of the capital city’s suburban communities.
-
B.
Lamar County
Lamar County is a county in northeastern Texas known for its seat in the city of Paris and its location near the Oklahoma border.
-
C.
Lamar County
Lamar County is a rural county in western Alabama known for its small communities and agricultural landscape.
-
D.
Lamar County
Lamar County is a county in the state of Georgia, United States, known for its seat in the city of Barnesville and its location in the central part of the state.
-
E.
Pearl River County
Pearl River County is a county in southern Mississippi known for its mix of small towns, including Picayune, and rural communities near the Louisiana border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d86d99e860819094b6957cde470f2c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04f50ce848190a839c4fb7306d793 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff82ee580c819082ad53db6da91f66 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:54 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:44 a.m.