Triple
T15655390
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meadow Mari language |
E376424
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAncestor |
P369
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Proto-Mari
Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral Uralic language from which the modern Meadow Mari language developed.
|
E877902
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proto-Mari | Statement: [Meadow Mari language, hasAncestor, Proto-Mari]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Proto-Mari Context triple: [Meadow Mari language, hasAncestor, Proto-Mari]
-
A.
Proto-Mari
Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral language from which the modern Hill Mari language developed.
-
B.
Proto-Gur
Proto-Gur is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Gur languages of West Africa, inferred through comparative linguistic analysis.
-
C.
Sara–Bagirmi languages
The Sara–Bagirmi languages are a group of closely related Central Sudanic languages spoken primarily in Chad and neighboring regions of Central Africa.
-
D.
Proto-Chadic
Proto-Chadic is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Chadic branch of the Afroasiatic language family, from which languages like Dass are believed to have descended.
-
E.
Colchidian languages
Colchidian languages are a subgroup of the Kartvelian language family spoken in western Georgia, including varieties such as Mingrelian and Laz.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Proto-Mari Triple: [Meadow Mari language, hasAncestor, Proto-Mari]
Generated description
Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral Uralic language from which the modern Meadow Mari language developed.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Proto-Mari Target entity description: Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral Uralic language from which the modern Meadow Mari language developed.
-
A.
Proto-Mari
chosen
Proto-Mari is the reconstructed ancestral language from which the modern Hill Mari language developed.
-
B.
Proto-Gur
Proto-Gur is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Gur languages of West Africa, inferred through comparative linguistic analysis.
-
C.
Sara–Bagirmi languages
The Sara–Bagirmi languages are a group of closely related Central Sudanic languages spoken primarily in Chad and neighboring regions of Central Africa.
-
D.
Proto-Chadic
Proto-Chadic is the reconstructed common ancestor of the Chadic branch of the Afroasiatic language family, from which languages like Dass are believed to have descended.
-
E.
Colchidian languages
Colchidian languages are a subgroup of the Kartvelian language family spoken in western Georgia, including varieties such as Mingrelian and Laz.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd1564c8190991adda63bfab4b0 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04ef1f83c8190bbf65eed162cbd55 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:52 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff67994fbc819090f2da267888e8fb |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:58 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ff6810af4c8190aa6cae98a1b8b5ce |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ff6888a85481909e8cdd34ed230fa4 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:15 a.m.