Triple
T15655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New England Commission of Higher Education |
E312
|
entity |
| Predicate | assessmentMethod |
P750
|
FINISHED |
| Object | peer review |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: peer review | Statement: [New England Commission of Higher Education, assessmentMethod, peer review]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: assessmentMethod Context triple: [New England Commission of Higher Education, assessmentMethod, peer review]
-
A.
usesComputationMethod
Indicates that an entity performs its processing or decision-making by applying a specified computational method or algorithm.
-
B.
supportsDiscipline
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or endorsement that helps sustain or advance a particular discipline.
-
C.
awardCriteria
Indicates the standards or conditions used to determine eligibility for receiving an award or recognition.
-
D.
eligibility
Indicates that an entity meets the required conditions or qualifications to participate in, receive, or perform something.
-
E.
accreditation
Indicates that an authoritative body has formally recognized an entity as meeting specified standards or requirements.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a240b249788190af8dbf7e80e9c91b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23feae8c481908d8c50faac01fc5c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a240b1551c81908abcae128ea45d00 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:11 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.