Triple
T1564624
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Connecticut General Court |
E33403
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesLegalPrinciple |
P1757
|
FINISHED |
| Object | English common law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: English common law | Statement: [Connecticut General Court, appliesLegalPrinciple, English common law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesLegalPrinciple Context triple: [Connecticut General Court, appliesLegalPrinciple, English common law]
-
A.
usesPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
-
B.
establishesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
-
C.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
D.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
E.
recognizesPrinciple
Indicates that an entity acknowledges the validity, authority, or applicability of a particular principle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885f11b048190935025a035302715 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a90fccd4b48190a44012888a00af7f |
completed | March 5, 2026, 5:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b872f0819096b3df6ad502c63e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:34 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.