Triple
T15630185
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Three Worlds Theory |
E375790
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedInArgumentAgainst |
P119516
|
FINISHED |
| Object | psychologism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: psychologism | Statement: [Three Worlds Theory, usedInArgumentAgainst, psychologism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedInArgumentAgainst Context triple: [Three Worlds Theory, usedInArgumentAgainst, psychologism]
-
A.
usedInArgumentAbout
Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as part of the reasoning or support within a particular argument or debate.
-
B.
usedInArgumentFor
Indicates that something (such as a statement, piece of evidence, or concept) is employed as support within an argument advocating for a particular claim or position.
-
C.
usesCounterpoint
Indicates that one entity employs counterpoint, combining independent melodic lines in a structured, interdependent musical relationship with another.
-
D.
usedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is employed, applied, or deployed in opposition to, or for the purpose of affecting, another entity.
-
E.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd035a48190b73d5579ab73969a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04eb536348190b93ed3c178d1ffb8 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda868d4481908f4bce1c64d2902a |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dff7f3016c8190ac68d76e65e07af4 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:14 a.m.