Triple
T15629338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 純一郎 |
E375766
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalKanjiMeaningOf一 |
P75329
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one | Statement: [純一郎, typicalKanjiMeaningOf一, one]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalKanjiMeaningOf一 Context triple: [純一郎, typicalKanjiMeaningOf一, one]
-
A.
typicalKanjiMeaning
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the standard or commonly accepted meaning associated with a given kanji character.
-
B.
possibleKanjiMeaning
Indicates that a given meaning is a possible or candidate interpretation associated with a particular kanji character.
-
C.
typicalKanjiSpelling
Indicates that one written form is the standard or most commonly used kanji spelling for another expression (such as a word or phrase).
-
D.
commonKanjiComponent
Indicates that two or more kanji share a common graphical component or radical in their written form.
-
E.
meaningDependsOnKanji
Indicates that the meaning of something (e.g., a word or expression) is determined by, or varies according to, the specific kanji characters used.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd035a48190b73d5579ab73969a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04eb4301881908c7157227fdf79b6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda868d4481908f4bce1c64d2902a |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:14 a.m.