Triple
T15629265
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jun |
E375764
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHomophones |
P119509
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Jun, hasHomophones, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHomophones Context triple: [Jun, hasHomophones, yes]
-
A.
hasPhonologicalSimilarityTo
Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar sound patterns or phonological features.
-
B.
hasPronunciationDifferenceFrom
Indicates that two linguistic items differ in how they are pronounced.
-
C.
hasMultipleMeanings
Indicates that a term, symbol, or expression is associated with more than one distinct meaning or interpretation.
-
D.
hasDistinctLetterForSound
Indicates that a particular sound is represented by its own unique letter, distinct from other sounds in the writing system.
-
E.
isHomographOf
Indicates that two words share the same written form but have different meanings, and possibly different pronunciations or origins.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd035a48190b73d5579ab73969a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04eb4301881908c7157227fdf79b6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda868d4481908f4bce1c64d2902a |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dff7f3016c8190ac68d76e65e07af4 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:14 a.m.