Triple
T15622656
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Library of America edition of As I Lay Dying |
E375595
|
entity |
| Predicate | editingQuality |
P119458
|
FINISHED |
| Object | carefully edited |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: carefully edited | Statement: [Library of America edition of As I Lay Dying, editingQuality, carefully edited]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: editingQuality Context triple: [Library of America edition of As I Lay Dying, editingQuality, carefully edited]
-
A.
editingProcess
Indicates the process by which content is reviewed, modified, and refined to improve clarity, accuracy, or quality.
-
B.
editingIs
Indicates that one entity is performing or undergoing the process of editing another entity.
-
C.
editingParadigm
Indicates the method or style of editing applied to content, such as the structural approach, workflow, or conceptual framework guiding how edits are performed.
-
D.
editingMedium
Indicates the medium or format through which an editing action is performed or realized.
-
E.
editedIn
Indicates that an entity was modified, revised, or otherwise altered within a particular context, tool, environment, or time frame.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccf2794819096cda4cbcb02d478 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e9cfd94819091459aa17a002eaf |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda868d4481908f4bce1c64d2902a |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dff7f3016c8190ac68d76e65e07af4 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:14 a.m.