Triple
T15621558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miwokan–Costanoan |
E375567
|
entity |
| Predicate | links |
P2535
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ohlone languages |
E75755
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ohlone languages | Statement: [Miwokan–Costanoan, links, Ohlone languages]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ohlone languages Context triple: [Miwokan–Costanoan, links, Ohlone languages]
-
A.
Ohlone languages
chosen
Ohlone languages are a group of closely related indigenous languages traditionally spoken by the Ohlone people of the central California coast.
-
B.
Bay Miwok
Bay Miwok refers to the Indigenous people and their now-extinct Miwokan language once spoken in the San Francisco Bay Area of California.
-
C.
Southeastern Pomo
Southeastern Pomo is one of the distinct Pomoan languages traditionally spoken by the Pomo people of Northern California.
-
D.
Miwok languages
Miwok languages are a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Miwok peoples of central and northern California.
-
E.
Klamath–Modoc language
The Klamath–Modoc language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Klamath and Modoc peoples of southern Oregon and northern California.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccf2794819096cda4cbcb02d478 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e9a95f08190b0013ba1428849d3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:51 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff5f3da754819085a6bd9876b12c65 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:13 a.m.