Triple

T15594255
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fantasy Beginning E374832 entity
Predicate typicalElements P5084 FINISHED
Object map or setting cues LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: map or setting cues | Statement: [Fantasy Beginning, typicalElements, map or setting cues]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalElements
Context triple: [Fantasy Beginning, typicalElements, map or setting cues]
  • A. typicalFeatures chosen
    Indicates that the related entities are characteristic or commonly occurring features or attributes of something.
  • B. typicalDesignElement
    Indicates that something is a common or characteristic design feature typically found in or associated with another entity.
  • C. typicalIn
    Indicates that something commonly occurs, appears, or is found within a given context, category, or environment.
  • D. typicalItem
    Indicates that an item is a representative or characteristic example of a broader category, class, or set.
  • E. typicalBase
    Indicates that one entity serves as the standard or most representative base or foundation for another entity in typical or common cases.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cce25008190b13b52745fbd719b completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e04e5e43d48190a8fd367f13f1c7e1 completed April 16, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69deda817e9881909b0c66fc9056f7d5 completed April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:12 a.m.