Triple
T15592229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Randall County |
E374773
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCountySeat |
P383
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canyon, Texas |
E582756
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canyon, Texas | Statement: [Randall County, hasCountySeat, Canyon, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Canyon, Texas Context triple: [Randall County, hasCountySeat, Canyon, Texas]
-
A.
Canyon, Texas
chosen
Canyon, Texas is a small city in the Texas Panhandle known as the home of West Texas A&M University and a gateway to nearby Palo Duro Canyon State Park.
-
B.
Tehuacana, Texas
Tehuacana, Texas is a small rural town in Limestone County known for its historic roots and quiet, close-knit community.
-
C.
Cottonwood, Texas
Cottonwood, Texas is a small rural community located within Kaufman County in the state of Texas.
-
D.
Crandall, Texas
Crandall, Texas is a small city in North Texas that serves as a residential community within the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area.
-
E.
Big Sandy, Texas
Big Sandy, Texas is a small rural town in East Texas known for its close-knit community and location within Upshur County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cce25008190b13b52745fbd719b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e5e43d48190a8fd367f13f1c7e1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff875bb0808190a6a4e3b47b524689 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:12 a.m.