Triple
T1558558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fort Michilimackinac |
E33264
|
entity |
| Predicate | reconstructionMethod |
P30323
|
FINISHED |
| Object | based on archaeological excavations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: based on archaeological excavations | Statement: [Fort Michilimackinac, reconstructionMethod, based on archaeological excavations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reconstructionMethod Context triple: [Fort Michilimackinac, reconstructionMethod, based on archaeological excavations]
-
A.
reconstructionFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a feature, component, or characteristic used in the reconstruction or restoration of another entity.
-
B.
reconstructionFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a reconstruction, restoration, or rebuilt version of another entity.
-
C.
reconstructedIn
Indicates that something has been rebuilt, restored, or re-created within a particular context, location, or medium.
-
D.
reconstructedAs
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, recreated, or inferred based on evidence, models, or partial information from another entity.
-
E.
reconstructionBuilt
Indicates that one entity carried out or was responsible for constructing a rebuilt or restored version of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ef9cf48190b0af0f5ce3d02231 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a9407d9d1481909597af97b16512cc |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b688d081908171f89010c53973 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a9407aa20881909e747f247ccec642 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:36 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.