Triple
T15579582
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine |
E374457
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPost-2005BoundariesFrom |
P119285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies |
E62909
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies | Statement: [West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, hasPost-2005BoundariesFrom, Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies Context triple: [West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, hasPost-2005BoundariesFrom, Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies]
-
A.
Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
chosen
The Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies was a comprehensive review by the Boundary Commissions that redrew UK parliamentary constituency boundaries ahead of the 2010 general election.
-
B.
Sixth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
The Sixth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies was a comprehensive review by the UK Boundary Commissions intended to redraw parliamentary constituency boundaries across the United Kingdom, though its proposals were ultimately not implemented.
-
C.
Third Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
The Third Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies was a major boundary review in the United Kingdom that redefined parliamentary constituency borders to reflect population changes and ensure fair representation in the House of Commons.
-
D.
Fourth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies
The Fourth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies was a comprehensive boundary review in the United Kingdom that redefined parliamentary constituency borders to reflect population changes and ensure fair representation.
-
E.
Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020
The Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020 is UK legislation that reformed the rules for reviewing and setting parliamentary constituency boundaries, including fixing the number of MPs and updating the review process.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPost-2005BoundariesFrom Context triple: [West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, hasPost-2005BoundariesFrom, Fifth Periodic Review of Westminster constituencies]
-
A.
hasPost-2011BoundaryReviewStatus
Indicates the status or outcome of an entity’s boundary review process conducted after the year 2011.
-
B.
boundariesInForceSinceElection
Indicates that the current boundaries have been in effect continuously since the specified election.
-
C.
electoralBoundaryAuthority
Indicates the authority or body responsible for defining, managing, or overseeing electoral boundaries for a given area.
-
D.
historicBoundaryFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a historical boundary or border associated with another entity, typically reflecting past territorial or administrative limits.
-
E.
showsBoundaries
Indicates that one entity visually or conceptually delineates the limits, edges, or extents of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85ccd575081908909b71a3f3e3a61 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04e24064c8190b132c3092877fbfa |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff4c4da9e48190a73492ef725380da |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69deda817e9881909b0c66fc9056f7d5 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69dff7f05f708190850f1d8782e132b0 |
completed | April 15, 2026, 8:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:11 a.m.