Triple

T1557382
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commandant of the Coast Guard E33237 entity
Predicate mayBeReappointed P1651 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Commandant of the Coast Guard, mayBeReappointed, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayBeReappointed
Context triple: [Commandant of the Coast Guard, mayBeReappointed, true]
  • A. canBeReelected
    Indicates that an individual currently holding an office or position is eligible to be chosen again for the same role in a subsequent election.
  • B. reappointmentPolicy chosen
    Indicates the rules or conditions governing whether and how an individual can be reappointed to a position or role.
  • C. reappointedHolder
    Indicates that an entity is again assigned or confirmed to hold a position, role, or office that it previously occupied.
  • D. allowsImmediatePresidentialReelection
    Indicates that a system, rule, or provision permits a president to run for and assume a consecutive subsequent term without any intervening gap in office.
  • E. mayHold
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885ef9cf48190b0af0f5ce3d02231 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a9407d9d1481909597af97b16512cc completed March 5, 2026, 8:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a907b688d081908171f89010c53973 completed March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:27 p.m.