Triple
T15563007
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cedar Creek Reservoir |
E371043
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasShorelineCommunity |
P33430
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tool, Texas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tool, Texas | Statement: [Cedar Creek Reservoir, hasShorelineCommunity, Tool, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tool, Texas Context triple: [Cedar Creek Reservoir, hasShorelineCommunity, Tool, Texas]
-
A.
Tool, Texas
chosen
Tool, Texas is a small lakeside city in Henderson County known for its proximity to Cedar Creek Reservoir and its rural, residential character.
-
B.
Navasota, Texas
Navasota, Texas is a small city in Grimes County that serves as a historic railroad and commercial hub within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
-
C.
Taylor, Texas
Taylor, Texas is a small city in central Texas known for its historic downtown, agricultural roots, and location within the Greater Austin metropolitan area.
-
D.
Douglass, Texas
Douglass, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community in East Texas known for its close-knit population and agricultural surroundings.
-
E.
Stinnett, Texas
Stinnett, Texas is a small city in the Texas Panhandle that serves as an administrative and service hub for the surrounding rural area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc6cf40819091f4a5facee1ebe6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04ddc66448190948280fb0c8d390c |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:09 a.m.