Triple
T15546393
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garza County |
E370619
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUnincorporatedCommunity |
P6345
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Cedar Lake, Texas
Cedar Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Garza County in the U.S. state of Texas.
|
E1165927
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cedar Lake, Texas | Statement: [Garza County, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Cedar Lake, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cedar Lake, Texas Context triple: [Garza County, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Cedar Lake, Texas]
-
A.
Springlake, Texas
Springlake, Texas is a small rural town located in Castro County on the High Plains of the Texas Panhandle.
-
B.
Silver Lake, Texas
Silver Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Van Zandt County in East Texas.
-
C.
Progreso Lakes, Texas
Progreso Lakes, Texas is a small city in Hidalgo County located in the Rio Grande Valley region of South Texas near the U.S.–Mexico border.
-
D.
Cedar Lake, Oklahoma
Cedar Lake, Oklahoma is a small lakeside community and recreational area in Canadian County known for fishing, boating, and rural residential living.
-
E.
Lakeport, Texas
Lakeport, Texas is a small city in Gregg County in East Texas, situated near Longview and part of the broader Longview–Marshall regional community.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Cedar Lake, Texas Triple: [Garza County, hasUnincorporatedCommunity, Cedar Lake, Texas]
Generated description
Cedar Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Garza County in the U.S. state of Texas.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cedar Lake, Texas Target entity description: Cedar Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Garza County in the U.S. state of Texas.
-
A.
Springlake, Texas
Springlake, Texas is a small rural town located in Castro County on the High Plains of the Texas Panhandle.
-
B.
Silver Lake, Texas
Silver Lake, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Van Zandt County in East Texas.
-
C.
Progreso Lakes, Texas
Progreso Lakes, Texas is a small city in Hidalgo County located in the Rio Grande Valley region of South Texas near the U.S.–Mexico border.
-
D.
Cedar Lake, Oklahoma
Cedar Lake, Oklahoma is a small lakeside community and recreational area in Canadian County known for fishing, boating, and rural residential living.
-
E.
Lakeport, Texas
Lakeport, Texas is a small city in Gregg County in East Texas, situated near Longview and part of the broader Longview–Marshall regional community.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cc521a08190921fb50319dddc34 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e04a9073948190b6e9cf504aacc7cf |
completed | April 16, 2026, 2:33 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff56bdbca08190b5eb541c5eb4bb09 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ff577e0ed08190a8f10f9e57c0e967 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ff584b7b28819096fd2fad58ca32d6 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:52 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:07 a.m.