Triple

T15521873
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Euro-Atlantic area E368987 entity
Predicate securityFrameworkIncludes P8765 FINISHED
Object collective defence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: collective defence | Statement: [Euro-Atlantic area, securityFrameworkIncludes, collective defence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityFrameworkIncludes
Context triple: [Euro-Atlantic area, securityFrameworkIncludes, collective defence]
  • A. hasSecurityArchitecture chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or defined by a particular security architecture design or framework.
  • B. securityAspect
    Indicates a relationship where something pertains to, represents, or characterizes a particular aspect or dimension of security.
  • C. securityFeature
    Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
  • D. securityCooperatesWith
    Indicates that one security-related entity collaborates or works jointly with another on security matters or activities.
  • E. securityMechanisms
    Indicates the protective methods, controls, or procedures implemented to safeguard entities from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a1794cc8190b0b428716296e63e completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e0403543188190abac49d2b9decb89 completed April 16, 2026, 1:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded2896a9c8190a8b9627deb3c17b4 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 4:04 a.m.