Triple

T15511938
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject eka-boron E368729 entity
Predicate correspondingElementDiscoveredIn P118942 FINISHED
Object 1879 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1879 | Statement: [eka-boron, correspondingElementDiscoveredIn, 1879]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: correspondingElementDiscoveredIn
Context triple: [eka-boron, correspondingElementDiscoveredIn, 1879]
  • A. associatedWithElement
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a particular element, such that the element is relevant to, involved in, or characteristic of that entity.
  • B. discoveredAs
    Indicates that one entity was first identified, found, or recognized in the role or form specified by another entity.
  • C. discoveredOnPropertyOf
    Indicates that something was found or detected while located on the property owned or controlled by a particular entity.
  • D. discoveredWith
    Indicates that one entity was found, detected, or identified using another entity as the means, tool, method, or accompanying context of discovery.
  • E. discoveredResource
    Indicates that an entity has found, identified, or uncovered a particular resource.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a1794cc8190b0b428716296e63e completed April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e04030c0208190a1931ea130075603 completed April 16, 2026, 1:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded2896a9c8190a8b9627deb3c17b4 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ded57165288190979b7acb71ad5145 completed April 15, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:56 a.m.