Triple
T15509953
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Hsenwi |
E368680
|
entity |
| Predicate | predecessor |
P97
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hsenwi |
E1155149
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hsenwi | Statement: [South Hsenwi, predecessor, Hsenwi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hsenwi Context triple: [South Hsenwi, predecessor, Hsenwi]
-
A.
Hsenwi
chosen
Hsenwi is a town in northern Myanmar historically known as a Shan principality and regional administrative center.
-
B.
South Hsenwi
South Hsenwi was a former Shan State in what is now Myanmar, historically ruled by local saophas and known for its role in the complex patchwork of semi-autonomous principalities in the region.
-
C.
Mingyi Swa
Mingyi Swa was a 14th-century crown prince and military commander of the Burmese Kingdom of Ava, known for his campaigns against neighboring states such as Hanthawaddy.
-
D.
North Hsenwi
North Hsenwi was a former Shan State in what is now Myanmar, historically ruled by local chiefs (saophas) and known for its role in the complex patchwork of semi-autonomous principalities in the region.
-
E.
Ta’ang
Ta’ang is a Mon–Khmer language spoken primarily by the Ta’ang (Palaung) ethnic group in parts of Myanmar and neighboring regions.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85a1794cc8190b0b428716296e63e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:01 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03fd008708190a3657863eb9ac626 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:48 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff36702ebc81908d6a00243865de61 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:55 a.m.