Triple
T15500572
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of the Republic of China (Taiwan) |
E378938
|
entity |
| Predicate | isFinalAppealFor |
P55088
|
FINISHED |
| Object | most civil cases in Taiwan |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: most civil cases in Taiwan | Statement: [Supreme Court of the Republic of China (Taiwan), isFinalAppealFor, most civil cases in Taiwan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isFinalAppealFor Context triple: [Supreme Court of the Republic of China (Taiwan), isFinalAppealFor, most civil cases in Taiwan]
-
A.
isFinalArbiterOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity has ultimate, authoritative decision-making power over another entity or over a particular matter, with no further appeal beyond that entity.
-
B.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
C.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
D.
appealStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
-
E.
hasAppellateJurisdictionIn
Indicates that one legal authority has the power to review and decide appeals arising from cases within a specified court, region, or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd53a7c819080f5b9042c4c199e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03fcb4e8c81908e4ab463e3ae252b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ded2896a9c8190a8b9627deb3c17b4 |
completed | April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:54 a.m.