Triple
T15498785
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States military courts of criminal appeals |
E378892
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | United States Department of Defense judicial structure |
E378892
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States Department of Defense judicial structure | Statement: [United States military courts of criminal appeals, partOf, United States Department of Defense judicial structure]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States Department of Defense judicial structure Context triple: [United States military courts of criminal appeals, partOf, United States Department of Defense judicial structure]
-
A.
United States court-martial system
The United States court-martial system is the formal military justice framework that conducts criminal trials of service members under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, operating as an internal judicial system separate from civilian courts.
-
B.
United States military courts of criminal appeals
chosen
The United States military courts of criminal appeals are intermediate appellate courts within the U.S. military justice system that review courts-martial convictions for legal and factual sufficiency.
-
C.
Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense
The Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Defense is the chief legal office of the U.S. Department of Defense, providing legal advice and services on all defense-related matters, including policy, operations, and compliance.
-
D.
Naval Judge Advocate General Department
The Naval Judge Advocate General Department is the legal affairs and military justice body of the Royal Thai Navy, responsible for providing legal advice, overseeing courts-martial, and ensuring compliance with military law and regulations.
-
E.
Office of the Judge Advocate General (Army)
The Office of the Judge Advocate General (Army) is the headquarters of the U.S. Army’s legal branch, overseeing military justice, legal policy, and legal services for soldiers and Army commands worldwide.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd53a7c819080f5b9042c4c199e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03fb0aee081909db1c54349ec8492 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:47 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff3667a53c81908be789f99e580265 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:53 a.m.