Triple

T15496033
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1963 Chicago mayoral election E378819 entity
Predicate percentageOfVoteForRichard J. Daley P118474 FINISHED
Object 58.83% LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 58.83% | Statement: [1963 Chicago mayoral election, percentageOfVoteForRichard J. Daley, 58.83%]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: percentageOfVoteForRichard J. Daley
Context triple: [1963 Chicago mayoral election, percentageOfVoteForRichard J. Daley, 58.83%]
  • A. WillkiePopularVotes
    Indicates the number of popular votes received by Willkie in a given election or electoral context.
  • B. popularVoteForThomasEDewey
    Indicates that the popular vote in an election was cast in favor of Thomas E. Dewey.
  • C. popularVotesForHoratio Seymour
    Indicates the number of popular votes that were cast in favor of Horatio Seymour in an election.
  • D. wonFirstDemocraticElection
    Indicates that the subject achieved victory in the first democratic election held for a given office, position, or context.
  • E. RobertMLaFollettePopularVoteShare
    Indicates the proportion of the total popular vote that was received by Robert M. La Follette in a given election or electoral context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85cd53a7c819080f5b9042c4c199e completed April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03faecd60819091eeaa56c9c8f67d completed April 16, 2026, 1:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded2874b788190999158e0f043be21 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ded5deee00819099fa3e43313312e1 completed April 15, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:52 a.m.