Triple
T15481359
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clayton County, Iowa |
E376924
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Monona, Iowa |
E919217
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Monona, Iowa | Statement: [Clayton County, Iowa, hasCity, Monona, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Monona, Iowa Context triple: [Clayton County, Iowa, hasCity, Monona, Iowa]
-
A.
Monona, Iowa
chosen
Monona, Iowa is a small city in Clayton County known for its rural Midwestern character and historic roots in northeastern Iowa.
-
B.
Monona, Wisconsin
Monona, Wisconsin is a small suburban city located on the shores of Lake Monona just southeast of downtown Madison.
-
C.
Kalona, Iowa
Kalona, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its large Amish and Mennonite communities and rich agricultural heritage.
-
D.
Hamlin, Iowa
Hamlin, Iowa is a small unincorporated rural community located in Audubon County in western Iowa.
-
E.
Washington, Iowa
Washington, Iowa is a small city in southeastern Iowa known for its historic downtown, agricultural surroundings, and role as a local commercial and cultural hub.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd21dcc81908646251b1c26ea00 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03f8cb4388190a3b4c92c3bb4ad4f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff4c3293dc819097f9e56963c333ee |
completed | May 9, 2026, 3:01 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:34 a.m.