Triple
T15481356
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clayton County, Iowa |
E376924
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Guttenberg, Iowa |
E718081
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Guttenberg, Iowa | Statement: [Clayton County, Iowa, hasCity, Guttenberg, Iowa]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Guttenberg, Iowa Context triple: [Clayton County, Iowa, hasCity, Guttenberg, Iowa]
-
A.
Guttenberg, Iowa
chosen
Guttenberg, Iowa is a small historic city along the Mississippi River in northeastern Iowa, known for its well-preserved limestone architecture and scenic riverfront.
-
B.
Bloomfield, Iowa
Bloomfield, Iowa is a small city in Davis County known for its historic town square and role as a local agricultural and commercial center in southeastern Iowa.
-
C.
Hancock, Iowa
Hancock, Iowa is a small rural city located in western Iowa within Pottawattamie County.
-
D.
Farragut, Iowa
Farragut, Iowa is a small city in Fremont County named in honor of U.S. Civil War Admiral David Farragut.
-
E.
Hudson, Iowa
Hudson, Iowa is a small city in northeastern Iowa that functions as a suburban community within the Waterloo–Cedar Falls metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d85cd21dcc81908646251b1c26ea00 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e03f8cb4388190a3b4c92c3bb4ad4f |
completed | April 16, 2026, 1:46 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ff365b3980819094d3ca0b7766009c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:34 a.m.