Triple

T1546998
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Wilhelm Gauss E32999 entity
Predicate sibling P363 FINISHED
Object Therese Gauss E176820 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Therese Gauss | Statement: [Wilhelm Gauss, sibling, Therese Gauss]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Therese Gauss
Context triple: [Wilhelm Gauss, sibling, Therese Gauss]
  • A. Therese Gauss chosen
    Therese Gauss was a member of the Gauss family, known primarily as a sibling of the mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss.
  • B. Josefine Anna Henninger
    Josefine Anna Henninger was the wife of philosopher Karl Popper, accompanying and supporting him throughout much of his academic and personal life.
  • C. Irene Schönbein
    Irene Schönbein was the wife of Nazi physician and Auschwitz camp doctor Josef Mengele.
  • D. Gertrud Heinrici
    Gertrud Heinrici was the wife of German Wehrmacht Colonel General Gotthard Heinrici and a member of the German aristocracy during the first half of the 20th century.
  • E. Marie-Thérèse Walter
    Marie-Thérèse Walter was a French woman best known as Pablo Picasso’s muse and lover, who inspired many of his most celebrated portraits and sculptures in the 1930s.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885ee6db8819099502bc5ce8af881 completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb20dd5a88190b3d6e6f0004fe9b4 completed March 7, 2026, 5:05 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69adc98b2b0081909d10b22d59c5e653 completed March 8, 2026, 7:10 p.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.