Triple

T15442035
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject City of Red Gold E369927 entity
Predicate metaphoricalReference P93472 FINISHED
Object gold LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gold | Statement: [City of Red Gold, metaphoricalReference, gold]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: metaphoricalReference
Context triple: [City of Red Gold, metaphoricalReference, gold]
  • A. hasMetaphoricalForm
    Indicates that one entity is expressed, represented, or understood through a metaphorical form or figurative expression involving another entity.
  • B. figurativeMeaning chosen
    Indicates that one entity is used in a non-literal, metaphorical, or symbolic sense to convey a meaning about another entity or concept.
  • C. hasMetaphoricalContent
    Indicates that something contains or expresses meaning through metaphorical, rather than purely literal, content.
  • D. keyMetaphor
    Indicates that one entity functions as a central or primary metaphor used to conceptualize, explain, or structure understanding of another entity.
  • E. titleMetaphor
    Indicates that the title of a work functions metaphorically, expressing a figurative or symbolic meaning rather than a literal one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a19180081909925012fbf4e62a3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03ef55f5c8190a32b1b6ad1daf454 completed April 16, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded28276f481908c2038bb301e57cf completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:21 a.m.