Triple

T15439699
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject XXX E369864 entity
Predicate hasNumericParity P43788 FINISHED
Object even LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: even | Statement: [XXX, hasNumericParity, even]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNumericParity
Context triple: [XXX, hasNumericParity, even]
  • A. hasParity
    Indicates that two entities share the same parity property (e.g., both even or both odd) with respect to a specified attribute or value.
  • B. hasParityPatterns
    Indicates that there is a specific pattern or regularity in the parity (odd/even characteristics) associated with the related entities.
  • C. requiresParityBetween
    Indicates that a balanced or matching condition must hold between two entities, such that their relevant attributes or quantities share the same parity or equivalence.
  • D. evennessProperty chosen
    Indicates that a quantity, value, or count has the property of being even, typically divisible into two equal integer parts without remainder.
  • E. valueParity
    Indicates that two compared values share the same parity (both even or both odd), or more generally, how a value’s parity is characterized in a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a19180081909925012fbf4e62a3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03eddf258819082679970b7d2b6af completed April 16, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded28276f481908c2038bb301e57cf completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:21 a.m.