Triple
T1543583
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Runway 4 |
E32925
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDirectionType |
P30196
|
FINISHED |
| Object | magnetic heading |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: magnetic heading | Statement: [Runway 4, hasDirectionType, magnetic heading]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDirectionType Context triple: [Runway 4, hasDirectionType, magnetic heading]
-
A.
containsDirectionOf
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses the directional orientation or path associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasRouteDirection
Indicates that a specified route is associated with a particular travel direction (e.g., inbound, outbound, northbound).
-
C.
hasTrafficDirection
Indicates that there is a specified flow or orientation of traffic associated with an entity (such as a road, lane, or route).
-
D.
hasDirectionVariability
Indicates that the direction associated with an entity or process is not fixed but varies over time, space, or conditions.
-
E.
directionalConfiguration
Indicates a specific spatial or directional arrangement that one entity has relative to another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aa95c1a2948190a2b98469afec1a7d |
completed | March 6, 2026, 8:52 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a907b2453c8190a41f6b88c8217d1e |
completed | March 5, 2026, 4:33 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a93df847cc8190b6d011af33b34b40 |
completed | March 5, 2026, 8:25 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.