Triple

T15432319
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Treaty of Fontainebleau (1762) E369669 entity
Predicate legalStatusOfLouisianaAfter P118756 FINISHED
Object Spanish colony LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish colony | Statement: [Treaty of Fontainebleau (1762), legalStatusOfLouisianaAfter, Spanish colony]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfLouisianaAfter
Context triple: [Treaty of Fontainebleau (1762), legalStatusOfLouisianaAfter, Spanish colony]
  • A. legalStatusAfter1801
    Indicates the legal status or condition of an entity as it existed or was defined after the year 1801.
  • B. legalStatusAfterCoup
    Indicates the legal status or standing of an entity following a coup or unconstitutional change of power.
  • C. legalStatusAfter2005
    Indicates the legal status or condition that applies to an entity starting from the year 2005 onward.
  • D. legalStatusAfter1980
    Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds specifically for the period after the year 1980.
  • E. legalStatusAfter1991
    Indicates the legal status or condition that an entity holds from the year 1991 onward, typically reflecting changes due to laws or regulations enacted at or after that time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d85a19180081909925012fbf4e62a3 completed April 10, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e03eda01cc8190843e23b260b8503c completed April 16, 2026, 1:43 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ded27f45548190a6d2b1b85cb47444 completed April 14, 2026, 11:49 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ded57005608190886cd01f640dfedb completed April 15, 2026, 12:01 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 3:21 a.m.